In writing modern, or contemporary verse it is easy for anyone to
make fun of, or point out what they feel is obscure to their eyes in
poetry, as it can be in any writing I suppose, but verse seems to get
its share of pro and con, in more than sufficiently amounts, normally
attacked, mostly by those not all that interested in verse in the first
place. I am not about to turn this writing into some kind of account,
but I do want to say a few words on this issue. Some modern poetry is
what I call defeatist, grant you, and perhaps too fantastic, and too
abstract, or too unreal or perhaps too eccentric--beyond the
psychological reality of mans mind. I try not to go in that direction,
but I do like plays and prose mixed with poetry, a good narrative in
poetry is real life at its highest expressions. And produce good ideas
in verse. This freedom I use, and others have, is not new, it was used
by Homer, and even the poem of Gilgamish, have threads of this mixture;
Shakespeare does it quite well also.
Yes, it is obvious that
poetry and prose are different. Prose can flow actually better, free
from poetic hang-ups; Poetry on the other hand seems to have more solid
points to it, and is slower to read usually, and write of course. In
prose you can bring up issues, or matters in the moment, in poetry, you
are working on moving the individual, emotionally, more so than in
thinking. Nowadays, people have a hard time understanding modern
poetry, in comparison to thousands of years ago. Perhaps we lost the
plot, theme and insight into much of the story in poetry, and need to
make adjustments, and so in prose mixed with poetry we can do that, as
long as we remember the poetic value resides in the solid elements it
brings.
No comments:
Post a Comment